Risk Assurance for Hedge Funds Using Zero Knowledge Proofs
نویسنده
چکیده
This work introduces a new tool for a fund manager to verifiably communicate portfolio risk characteristics to an investor. We address the classic dilemma: How can an investor and fund manager build trust when the two party’s interests are not aligned? In addition to high returns, a savvy investor would like a fund’s composition to reflect his own risk preferences. Hedge funds, on the other hand, seek high returns (and commissions) by exploiting arbitrage opportunities and keeping them secret. The nature and amount of risk present in these highly secretive portfolios and hedging strategies are certainly not transparent to the investor. This work describes how to apply standard tools of cryptographic commitments and zero-knowledge proofs, to financial engineering. The idea is to have the fund manager describe the portfolio contents indirectly by specifying the asset quantities with cryptographic commitments. Without de-committing the portfolio composition, the manager can use zero knowledge proofs to reveal chosen features to investors such as the portfolio’s approximate sector allocation, risk factor sensitivities, or its future value under a hypothetical scenario. The investor can verify that the revealed portfolio features are consistent with the committed portfolio, thus obtaining strong assurance of their correctness any dishonest portfolio commitment would later serve as clear-cut evidence of fraud. The result is a closer alignment of the manager’s and investor’s interests: the investor can monitor the fund’s risk characteristics, and the fund manager can proceed without leaking the exact security composition to competitors.
منابع مشابه
Are “Market Neutral” Hedge Funds Really Market Neutral?
Using a variety of different definitions of “neutrality,” this study presents significant evidence against the neutrality to market risk of hedge funds in a range of style categories. I generalize standard definitions of “market neutrality,” and propose five different neutrality concepts. I suggest statistical tests for each neutrality concept, and apply these tests to a database of monthly ret...
متن کاملLiquidity Spillovers in Hedge Funds: Evidence from the Holdings of Funds of Hedge Funds
We examine whether funds of hedge funds (FoFs) engage in costly fire sales of their hedge fund investments during the 2004–2011 period. We find that FoFs experiencing large outflows tend to liquidate holdings in funds with relatively few redemption restrictions (“liquid funds”), even when these funds perform well. A tracking portfolio that buys liquid funds involved in fire sales over the prior...
متن کاملDo Hedge Funds Have Enough Capital? A Value at Risk Approach
In this paper, we examine the risk characteristics and capital adequacy of hedge funds using Value-at-Risk (VaR) as the criterion for measuring risk and estimating capital requirements. We find that a vast majority of hedge funds are adequately capitalized, with the level of under-capitalization being only 3.1% for live funds and 7.5% for dead funds. Using extreme value theory, we confirm that ...
متن کاملDo Hedge Funds Have Enough Capital
In this paper, we examine the risk characteristics and capital adequacy of hedge funds using Value-at-Risk (based on Extreme Value Theory) as the criterion for measuring risk and estimating capital requirements. Using extensive data on nearly thirteen hundred live and dead hedge funds, we find that the vast majority of funds are adequately capitalized. In addition, a large fraction of hedge fun...
متن کاملOn the Performance of Hedge Funds
This paper investigates hedge fund performance and risk. The empirical evidence indicates that hedge funds differ substantially from traditional investment vehicles such as mutual funds. The funds with watermarks significantly outperform the funds without watermarks. The average hedge fund returns are related positively to incentive fees, the size of the fund, and the lockup period. Hedge funds...
متن کامل